|
Proceedings -Tuesday, October 9, 2001
TuOD1
Mix & Split Libraries to Parallel Synthesis:
A Collaborative High Throughput Chemistry / Analytical Chemistry Transition (1996-2001)
Cornelis E. C. A. Hop and Yuan-Qing Xia, Merck Research Laboratories
Background:
The progression of analytical chemistry techniques at Glaxo
SmithKline is profiled in this presentation. Procedures and hardware
in use from 1996 to present day 2001 are reviewed, demonstrating the
dramatic impact of today's high throughput chemistry and analysis
techniques. Back in 1996-1997, chemistry optimization used open
access (OA) flow injection analysis/MS having a throughput rate of
20 samples per hour. LCMS analysis required submitting a request and
waiting 1-2 days for turnaround (using 20 min run times). Also about
this time, library QC/Hit identification used the one bead/one
compound approach. The molecular ion was identified and matched
against a list of possible molecular weights; purity was estimated
at 214 nm. Various outside pressures emerged to improve throughput
needs: higher density HTS platforms (40 million wells screened per
year), greater quantities required of synthesized compounds, HT ADME
tox assays were introduced, and parallel synthesis methods evolved
(requiring LC-based purification techniques). The demand for LCMS
services increased and newer strategies to improve throughput,
standardization and communication across groups were required.
Premise:
Combinatorial chemistry synthesis techniques have been primarily
applied toward the creation of drug discovery leads. Samples can be
prepared and assayed as mixtures; active compounds are identified by
one of three processes: a deconvolution process, proprietary resin
"tagging" schemes and direct MS identification. Hits are confirmed
by re-synthesis. Parallel synthesis of discrete compounds is also
performed to deliver large masses (5-20 mg) of compounds in support
of worldwide HTS, selectivity and ADME tox assays. In this scheme,
from 24 to 10,000 compounds are prepared per array; thus, 100,000 -
250,000 compounds per year. Clearly, high throughput chemistry is
required to support this accelerated and widespread compound
synthesis and analysis need.
Analytical contributions and high throughput chemistry needs today
can be classified into four categories:
- Chemistry optimization and validation
- Array production and QC
- Array purification
- HTS monitoring
Chemistry Optimization and Validation Open access LCMS has proved
popular with chemists for many reasons. The technique identifies
reaction products (M+H), assesses purity of reagent/product,
monitors reaction progress and rates, provides quick answers using
convenient microplate formats, and the system is maintained and
upgraded by experts. The benefits of standardization are clearly
evident, e.g., friendly interface, robust gradient LCMS methods, a
common data presentation format and intranet database storage and
retrieval of results.
Open access usage trends have increased over the years at GSK, as
shown below.
Open access development needs center on several issues. An increase
in throughput without loss of selectivity is needed (shorter cycle
times, parallel analysis). Scheduling for large batch jobs
(overnight) should be available. An on-line universal detector and
means for quantitation is needed.
Array Production and QC Using LCMS and HT-NMR LCMS is used for
purity assessment of arrays. Standardization for analytical methods
and hardware is required. Custom scripts for identification are
useful. LCMS data is integrated with in-house decision-making
software. Additional LCMS development needs include standard
approaches for data archival, intelligent data review and revision
systems, and improved throughput (e.g., desire 1-2 hr analysis time
for a 500 compound array).
HT-NMR uses a Varian VAST (500 MHz); samples are in microplate
format; 6 min/analysis. Development needs for HT-NMR center on
reducing the acquisition and analysis time so that it is less than
or equal to that of LCMS. Also, reduced compound mass for analysis
is desired so that product yield is not compromised when an aliquot
is removed for HT-NMR.
Array Purification Preparative LC methods are now in use that are
rapid (6 min gradient; 10-100% ACN at 25 mL/min). A 20 x 50 mm
column (5 um) is commonly used to purify from 5-100 mg crude
material. Generic methods developed are suitable for 90% of the
assay requirements. Fractionation is commonly triggered by a UV
signal. Topics of debate in array purification include the approach
of a "purification specialist group" vs. open access for all
chemists, and the benefit to risk of human intervention in the
process. Development needs for LC-based methods are: improving
sample throughput, improved trigger using both UV and MS,
scale-optimized systems and a chemist-friendly and reliable
operation.
HTS Monitoring Good decision-making in reviewing HTS data and hit
characterization requires accurate, catalogued and accessible data.
|