|
Day 1
Vendor Session -
Proteomics Technologies & Applications
Improved Bottom-Up Protein Identification Using A New Two-Dimensional
Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer
Leo E Bonilla*1; Jacob D Jaffe3; Rohan Thakur1; Andrew Guzzetta1;
James Shofstahl1; Michael Senko1; Jae Schwartz1
1ThermoFinnigan Corporation; 2Harvard-Partners Center for
Genetics and Genomics; 3Department of Genetics, Harvard
Medical School; 4Department of Molecular & Cellular Biology,
Harvard University
Most current bottom-up proteomics experiments rely on high-throughput
correlation analysis between uninterpreted MS/MS spectra and database
entries in order to obtain highly specific, high-confidence peptide
sequences to give unambiguous protein identifications. Under this
scheme, the confidence level for the identification of a protein,
whether pure or as part of a complex mixture, is a function of several
factors including (a) the number of discrete, 'signature' peptides
sequenced (i.e., protein coverage) and the size of the protein itself,
(b) the quality of the spectrum-database correlations and their
statistical distributions, (c) the total number of spectra analyzed, and
(d) the size and redundancy of the database. We are now reporting on the
significant benefits to factors (a)-(c) realized through the use of a
two-dimensional ion trap mass spectrometer. Our preliminary results
indicate that the two-dimensional trap produces both higher protein
coverage and better quality protein identifications. The gain in
coverage occurs at two levels: (a) a multifold increase in the total
number of proteins identified per run and, (b) a higher number of
discrete peptides sequenced per protein per run. For instance, in one of
the experiments the two-dimensional trap yielded 191 high-confidence
protein IDs versus 66 for the same sample using the three-dimensional
trap. Furthermore, the same set of ten, top-scoring proteins were
observed using both mass spectrometers; however, in each of the ten
cases, protein scores were several fold higher for IDs made with the
two-dimensional trap vs. the three-dimensional one. We've interpret
these gains to be the direct result of faster rates of data acquisition,
the enhanced quality of single MS/MS scans and improved detectability of
low-level and/or poorly ionizable peptides.

Return to Proceedings »
|